Debating the Anthrax Attacks of 2001

The Purpose of this blog is to allow people to intelligently debate the comments I make on my web site at www.anthraxinvestigation.com.

All post are moderated. My hours are 9-5. Please choose "Name/URL" in the "Comment as:" box and fill in a unique name, like "John Doe" or "Anonymous #4972." You can leave the URL blank.

Questions? My email address is detect (at) newsguy (dot) com

Thursday, September 25, 2014

Subject: The absurd al Qaeda anthrax theory

›
In the previous thread HERE , "DXer" (a.k.a. "Anonymous") argued that El-Shukrijumah called his mother from Afghanista...
29 comments:
Tuesday, September 9, 2014

9/11 Truthers versus Anthrax Truthers

›
Here is how Anthrax Truther Lew Weinstein describes the Amerithrax evidence:   The FBI’s case against Dr. Ivins is clearly bogu...
59 comments:
Monday, July 7, 2014

Subject: Discussions versus Arguments

›
In the prior two threads it was made perfectly clear that Mr. Rowley does not agree with the definitions of "Discussion" versus ...
35 comments:
Sunday, June 8, 2014

Subject: What is "Evidence"?

›
Conspiracy theorists do not seem to understand what evidence is or how it works in court.  Instead, they seem to want to use beliefs, theo...
15 comments:
Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Subject: Conspiracy Theorist Psychology

›
A 2013 article from Slate magazine titled  " Conspiracy Theorists Aren’t Really Skeptics: The fascinating psychology of people who k...
112 comments:
Monday, April 28, 2014

Subject: Summing up Anthrax Truther Arguments

›
The past 12 years of arguing with Anthrax Truthers have been summarized in the past 24 hours in a debate with DXer/Anonymous. DXer wrote...
9 comments:
Thursday, April 10, 2014

Subject: Putting 2 and 2 together

›
Conspiracy theorists and True Believers have once again demonstrated how they think.  Just look at their theories about the disappear...
36 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Ed Lake
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.